Executive Session with Patch's Warren Webster

Patch Ramps Up Hyperlocal Gamble

The AOL-owned network of more than 800 sites upped the ante last week by adding thousands of unpaid bloggers to its editorial engine. Patch President Warren Webster says he's eyeing a near-future map of Patch communities with very few blank spaces in between. Claiming that early viewership metrics are exceeding expectations, Webster also says that mobile platforms will play a key role in Patch’s continued growth.
NetNewsCheck,

If hyperlocal is truly the next news frontier, Patch is the nation’s biggest homesteader. The AOL-owned network of sites is garnering as much attention for its rapid proliferation — 814 sites in 18 states plus Washington, D.C., and counting — as for its reported $160 million investment in hyperlocal this year alone.

Patch hired more than 1,000 editors in 2010 and has upped the ante by bringing on additional thousands of unpaid local bloggers in recent weeks. It’s an initiative that notably follows the mold of The Huffington Post, the recent $315 million AOL acquisition that may be playing the de facto big sister to the fledgling network.

Story continues after the ad

Patch President Warren Webster says there are lessons to learn from The Huffington Post, and he’s paying close attention as Patch’s content model evolves. He’s also eyeing a near-future map of Patch communities with very few blank spaces in between.

In an interview with NetNewsCheck's Michael Depp, Webster says Patch’s criteria for growth in new communities is sound and sustainable, as is its locally centric business model. He says early viewership metrics are exceeding expectations, and that mobile platforms will play a key role in Patch’s continued growth.

An edited transcript:


Patch represents a massive investment in hyperlocal for AOL. For many, this is a can’t-miss, $1 billion-a-year front, and yet the hyperlocal field is strewn with more than a few bodies that weren’t able to make it work. Why does AOL see this front as so pivotal for its strategy, and how is Patch going to do it differently?

The media landscape has changed enormously in just the last year — and five years. Since we started three years ago, we’ve even seen more of a need for a company like Patch. The differentiator between us and those who’ve tried this before is three-fold. One, we’re looking at this as a scaled big opportunity where we know we need to be everywhere ultimately. Two, we are looking at this as a platform that empowers local journalists and local residents to really run these sites — to provide the content, to drive where they go. And three, the technology. I think we bring a best-in-class technology to the problem.

The void in local news and information has only grown in the last couple of years, and we see that as a major opportunity and a major need.

Patch’s rapid growth is capturing a lot of attention, having added 33 new targeted sites just this week alone. Now it’s in 810 local markets overall in 18 states plus Washington, D.C. What is Patch’s ultimate target in terms of markets and state coverage this year and next?

The momentum has been amazing. In fact, every time I talk to anyone I have to check where we are. As of yesterday it was 810. Today we’re at 814. We just launched two new sites in Newark, N.J. We expect to be in 1,000 sites by the end of this year, and at the end of this year we’ll look around and see what the next milestone will be. Ultimately, we believe that every community in America could use a Patch, and the success of the Patch sites so far is a testament to that.

So ultimately this is a 50-state strategy?

Ultimately that’s what we believe should happen. We’re going to look next year and see where we should go next.

Is the $160 million-a-year, with $40 million being widely touted as AOL’s investment in Patch in the first quarter, accurate? If so, can you give me an idea of where the investment typically goes to grow a new Patch market?

I can’t speak to the level of investment beyond what’s been publicly announced in the filings, but I can tell you we invest heavily in hiring local journalists and other local staff including advertising staff. In 2010, we believe we were the largest hirer of journalists in the U.S., and we hope to continue to be able to hire journalists at a time when most news outlets are not.

We also invest in technology in the back end. Our headquarters is staffed by people who are supporting the local sites with technology, marketing and research and information.

By what criteria does Patch choose its markets for expansion? What are you looking for in terms of demographics and community size in adding a new market?

It’s really a range. We just launched two sites today in Newark, inner city sites — South Ward Patch and West Ward Patch. We’ve recently just launched our first Patch military site at Camp Pendleton. We’ve announced plans for Patch Latino, which will start in Southern California and be largely in Spanish.

When we first started Patch, we realized we could go anywhere, so how do we decide where to go? We created a half-qualitative and half-quantitative process to build our list of where to go first. On the quantitative side, we built an algorithm that weights 59 different factors ranging from the voter turnout index against the national average to the ranking of the local public high school because we want to find communities that are very engaged in what goes on in the town. And we ran every Census track in America — all 63,000 Census tracks — through that algorithm and we plotted them on a map and looked for clusters [because] our management structure depends on having clusters of sites all very close to each other.

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (0) -

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2874.04 +0.00 (+0.00)
NYSE 7592.82 +0.00 (+0.00)
S&P 500 1324.80 +0.00 (+0.00)
Updated 05/17 9:30a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content
Opinions
Features
Ideas
  • Mobile And The Media's Imploding Biz Model

    Michael Wolff: "If the news business on the Web is depressing, contributing to the existential angst that has gripped every established news organization, mobile turns the story apocalyptic: there is no foreseeable basis on which the news establishment can support itself. There is no way even a stripped-down, aggregation-based, unpaid citizen-journalist staffed newsroom can support itself in a mobile world."

  • WashPo Ombud's Paywall Analysis Is Faulty

    Ryan Chittum: "You can't compare nine months of circulation-revenue changes to 12 months of ad-revenue changes and then say the former 'didn't even cover the decline in the latter.' That's like giving somebody a 100 meter headstart in the 400 meters and then talking about how the laggard couldn't even compete, even though they ran faster than the rest of the field."

  • The 'Sharing' Mirage

    Frédéric Filloux on the benefits and pitfalls of teaming up with content distributors: "Media should be very careful with their level of reliance on other content distributors such as Facebook, Google, Apple or Amazon. This can be summed up to a simple question: can we trust them?The short answer is no."

  • Paywalls Open Doors For Local News Sites

    Howard Owens: "As a matter of business reality, when an incumbent business moves deeper into sustaining innovation it opens up opportunities for disruptors. In every market where a newspaper puts up a paywall, an opportunity is created for an entrepreneur to start a local online news business."

  • For Future Of News, Killer App Is Credibility

    Robert Hernandez, an assistant professor of professional practice in journalism at USC Annenberg: "With technology empowering everyone with the ability to create and to distribute, I predict — and wish — that in 2012 the new dominating factor will be Credibility. Actually, earned Credibility."

  • Layoffs, Cutbacks Lead To News Deserts

    Tom Stites: "Desertification is on the march, claiming more and more communities as newspapers continue to wither and few Web efforts manage to replace more than a fraction of the original reporting that newspapers have abandoned."

  • Moneyball: Fixing Newspaper Web Sales

    Mel Taylor: "Today's Newspaper industry is like that once great, but now struggling baseball team playing on a new, hyper-competitive field called the Internet. The veteran print team is stuck in a rut using the same, tired strategy that did serve them well for years, but no longer. Today, they get trounced by those with more money and muscle."

  • The Metric For Missed Expectations

    Matthew Shanahan: "Here’s the problem: [Click-through rates don't] take into account audience engagement, not to mention the fact that other advertisers are competing for the click-through on the same page."

  • View More Opinion & Commentary

     

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad