DIGITAL DMAs: Indianapolis

Social Media Boosts Fortunes At WTHR

A concerted investment in social media and a new website have helped Dispatch Broadcast Group's WTHR increase its audience and enhance its profile in the Indianapolis digital scene. Harder news reigns at the market's online leader The Indianapolis Star, where computer assisted reporting is deepening content. [Updated]
By
NetNewsCheck,

%22+width%3D
Photos+courtesy+of+the+Indianapolis+Convention+%26amp%3B+Visitors+Assoc.
Photos courtesy of the Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Assoc.

In many markets, digital media have spawned audacious, independent news outlets that complement — and sometimes compete with — their print and broadcast forbears. But in Indianapolis, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, et al have become favored tools of the region’s leading daily newspaper and TV network affiliates, and helped them assert control of the Web.

“I do think legacy media have a sort of stranglehold,” said Dan Drew, the interim executive associate dean of the Indiana University School of Journalism at IUPUI. “I think they’re very strong.”

Story continues after the ad

%22+width%3D
A Media Audit survey conducted late last year showed the Web sites of the Indianapolis Star and NBC affiliate WTHR in a virtual dead heat, with a third of all respondents saying they had visited in the previous 30 days. Although other measurement sources show a less dramatic gain for WTHR and have the station as the market's No. 3 digital player. Sites belonging to CBS affiliate WISH and FOX59 were named by a quarter of Media Audit respondents, and there is little evidence Indy’s online hegemony has shifted dramatically since then.

If anything, the popular might be getting more popular. WTHR.com, for instance, has drawn more than a million unique visitors in nine consecutive months, according to Digital Media Director Amy Parish. The station overhauled its outdated Web site last year, Parish said, and viewers have responded by logging on more frequently.

“The Web site is a direct reflection of our on-air product,” she said. “In every newscast, we’re directing viewers to the site for more content.”

Parish has led an all-out Facebook campaign at WTHR.com. In May, when the station had only 8,000 “likes” on the social networking site, WTHR hired Kyle Lacy, a digital media guru and the author of Twitter Marketing for Dummies, to help bolster its Facebook presence. The result, Parish said, was a new assignment: “Every on-air talent had to have a fan page and had to update it at least once per day.”

Reporters and anchors met the effort with “trepidation,” Parish said; management eyed it with skepticism.

“I remember the first question someone asked was, ‘How will this help our bottom line?’” Parish recalled.

Seven months later, WTHR has almost 100,000 Facebook likes, and WTHR.com advertising spots are sold out.

Social media is a similarly strategic element at IndyStar.com, but the newspaper Web site, with a distinctly harder news edge, is devoting resources to another digital instrument: computer-assisted reporting. CAR, a buzzword at journalism conferences, is actually older than most people realize, according to Mark Nichols, the Star’s computer-assisted reporter.

“I don’t think computer-assisted reporting is necessarily a new frontier anymore,” Nichols said. “I’ve been doing it full-time for 10 years and have been doing it since the early ’90s.”

At its core, CAR is about using computers to collect, organize and analyze data — certainly not a recent development. But if computer-assisted reporting is not new, it is definitely changing, Nichols says. Media leaders such as The New York Times and ProPublica are using CAR techniques not only behind the scenes of investigative reports, but also to “tell stories on the Web using data in a way that couldn’t be done before in print.”

“At the Star, what I’m trying to do is look to those institutions and try to emulate it on a local basis,” Nichols said.

In November, for example, IndyStar.com created an interactive map to help readers digest every nuance of the Indianapolis mayoral election. The map featured precinct-by-precinct data about voter turnout, income, race, unemployment and campaign contributions. It would have been impractical, if not impossible, to replicate the map in the newspaper.

Right now, Nichols is playing with the latest batch of U.S. Census data, looking for storylines fit for print — and for the Web alone.

“For years, I was part of the investigative team,” Nichols said, “but the Star recently formed a digital team, and I’ve moved there. It’s part of the paper’s emphasis on trying to think digital first. Some of the things I work on could be Web exclusive.”

The Indiana Business Journal also delineates — rather firmly — between print and online content. IBJ.com makes breaking news, blogs, wire stories, and some other material available to anyone, but since May the site has charged for access to almost all articles that appear in the weekly print edition.

“That’s our premium content,” Online Editor Andrea Muirragui Davis said, “and to give it away would be to devalue a subscription.”

The Journal offers three subscription levels: digital for $1.25 per week, print for $1.52 per week, both for $1.64 per week. Digital subscriptions constitute a small percentage of the whole, Davis admitted, but the partial paywall is “working well enough that we’re sticking with it.”

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (0) -

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2862.06 -11.98 (-0.42%)
NYSE 7561.61 -31.21 (-0.41%)
S&P 500 1320.34 -4.46 (-0.34%)
Updated 05/17 10:23a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content
Opinions
Features
Ideas
  • Mobile And The Media's Imploding Biz Model

    Michael Wolff: "If the news business on the Web is depressing, contributing to the existential angst that has gripped every established news organization, mobile turns the story apocalyptic: there is no foreseeable basis on which the news establishment can support itself. There is no way even a stripped-down, aggregation-based, unpaid citizen-journalist staffed newsroom can support itself in a mobile world."

  • WashPo Ombud's Paywall Analysis Is Faulty

    Ryan Chittum: "You can't compare nine months of circulation-revenue changes to 12 months of ad-revenue changes and then say the former 'didn't even cover the decline in the latter.' That's like giving somebody a 100 meter headstart in the 400 meters and then talking about how the laggard couldn't even compete, even though they ran faster than the rest of the field."

  • The 'Sharing' Mirage

    Frédéric Filloux on the benefits and pitfalls of teaming up with content distributors: "Media should be very careful with their level of reliance on other content distributors such as Facebook, Google, Apple or Amazon. This can be summed up to a simple question: can we trust them?The short answer is no."

  • Paywalls Open Doors For Local News Sites

    Howard Owens: "As a matter of business reality, when an incumbent business moves deeper into sustaining innovation it opens up opportunities for disruptors. In every market where a newspaper puts up a paywall, an opportunity is created for an entrepreneur to start a local online news business."

  • For Future Of News, Killer App Is Credibility

    Robert Hernandez, an assistant professor of professional practice in journalism at USC Annenberg: "With technology empowering everyone with the ability to create and to distribute, I predict — and wish — that in 2012 the new dominating factor will be Credibility. Actually, earned Credibility."

  • Layoffs, Cutbacks Lead To News Deserts

    Tom Stites: "Desertification is on the march, claiming more and more communities as newspapers continue to wither and few Web efforts manage to replace more than a fraction of the original reporting that newspapers have abandoned."

  • Moneyball: Fixing Newspaper Web Sales

    Mel Taylor: "Today's Newspaper industry is like that once great, but now struggling baseball team playing on a new, hyper-competitive field called the Internet. The veteran print team is stuck in a rut using the same, tired strategy that did serve them well for years, but no longer. Today, they get trounced by those with more money and muscle."

  • The Metric For Missed Expectations

    Matthew Shanahan: "Here’s the problem: [Click-through rates don't] take into account audience engagement, not to mention the fact that other advertisers are competing for the click-through on the same page."

  • View More Opinion & Commentary

     

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad