Digital DMAs

Charlotte Media Diverge On Social Strategy

In Charlotte, N.C., media players are prepping for September’s Democratic National Convention and bulking up their social and mobile offerings. While The Charlotte Observer is the market’s top player, three TV sites are scrapping for prominence in a city where players differ sharply on how to use social media to drive traffic.
NetNewsCheck,

%22+width%3D
Photo+by+Patrick+Schneider+Photography
Photo by Patrick Schneider Photography

Charlotte, N.C.’s news sites are busily planning coverage to help readers follow the Democratic National Convention when it arrives here in September — and to help locals navigate around it.

WCNC.com, a TV site, for example, said it will have content letting Charlotte residents know which streets to avoid -- and out-of-town conventioneers know where to stay and eat in town.

Story continues after the ad

%22+width%3D

As the convention approaches, media in this market of 3 million, ranked 25th by Nielsen, will be vying for traffic and advertising tied to it. They chased almost $867 million in local ad dollars spent here last year, according to media consultants Borrell Associates, about $131 million of which came in the form of online ads.

And local spending is expected to reach $1.1 billion by 2016, according to Borrell, with the online portion racing up 83%, to just under $240 million.

Social media is becoming more important in Charlotte as elsewhere, and will likely play a role come September. But in this market, a philosophical crack has developed along the social media fault line.

Perhaps the market’s most popular TV site, Cox Media Group’s WSOCtv.com, has embraced social media. In December, it added a Google Plus page (now that businesses can) to the ubiquitous Facebook page and Twitter feeds. And the ABC-affiliate has been working on a YouTube page as a place to post video, according to Jennifer Haynes-Watkins, manager of site services there.

WCNC.com, Charlotte’s Belo-owned NBC affiliate, and the second-most trafficked TV site, according to comScore, also has a new Google Plus page. It hasn’t gotten much traffic yet, according to Amy Lehtonen, the station’s director of digital media.

But Facebook pages posted by the station and its editorial staff have attracted more than 99,000 “likes,” she said. “We get a lot of news tips from people on Facebook,” she added.

User responses spike during severe weather, Lehtonen said. And the station’s chief meteorologist, an avid tweeter, has 10,000 followers, dwarfing the numbers for his competitors, she boasted.

But just as some newspaper officials questioned the wisdom of herding paying subscribers onto free websites, the Internet director at a third TV site here criticizes the strategy of diverting website followers to Facebook.

“Why not just send people to your prime property?” asked Rod Overton, Internet director for WBTV.com, a CBS affiliate owned by Raycom Media. “Why would you ever send them away?”

Yes, he allowed, WBTV does have a Facebook page, but it uses social media for news tips and rarely directs users there, instead working to lure people from Facebook to the main site, he said. “It’s a tool — not a destination.”

Plus, he complained, “Social media has made it harder for traditional media to stay focused.”

The dominant site here — The Charlotte Observer’s charlotteobserver.com — uses Facebook and Twitter to update readers and attract news tips, according to Rick Thames, editor at the McClatchy Co. publication.

Its 7,900 Facebook fan count suggests a less aggressive social media strategy than, say, WCNC.com’s.

Instead, the newspaper site has focused on forming partnerships with local bloggers and smaller sites to increase access to neighborhood news and make up for coverage lost in recent downsizings.

A 2009 grant from J-Lab: The Institute for Interactive Journalism, helped the Observer create the Charlotte News Alliance, which links to articles from about 20 partners, supplying local coverage the newspaper can’t always provide itself, Thames said.

Among alliance members is a site oriented to the African-American community, QCityMetro.com.

DavidsonNews.net, a site that covers a small town about 20 miles north of Charlotte, was a member but dropped out. David Boraks, publisher and executive editor of Davidson News LLC, which owns DavidsonNews and a sister site, CorneliusNews.net, said he decided he had nothing to gain from the partnership. “They [the Observer] were basically getting free content from us for a year.”

Even without the Observer, the Davidson site pulls in 30,000 monthly unique visitors while serving a town of around 10,000, and the company is doing well enough with local coverage to consider adding a third small-town site, Boraks said.

Meanwhile, the Observer is developing another alliance aimed at boosting arts coverage, using early funding from the Knight Foundation and the National Endowment for the Arts, Thames said. The paper has five partners in the arts alliance, he said.

In addition, the paper has stolen a strategy from public radio and recruited underwriters to pay for new arts, science/tech and youth news packages that appear in the paper each week and are posted on the site as well, Thames said.

Money from a local healthcare company allowed the paper to add two more pages of arts coverage in a weekly package called Arts Alive, he explained. Another two pages in a weekly Sci-Tech package are paid for by Duke Energy, and a two-page Young Achievers section appears on Tuesday, complements of a natural gas firm, he said.

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (7) -

Rocker Nickname posted 3 months ago
If you are wondering why WBTV is in 3rd place among TV stations, Overton's zero-sum philosophy of social media pretty much answers the question.
GoFacebookYourself e Nickname posted 3 months ago
The ignorance from Rocker is staggering. An also-ran website in 2009 has managed to beat the Belo station in less than 3 years. This proves WCNC's strategy of extreme Facebook shilling doesn't work. Rocker is either on Facebook's payroll or a sad little shell of a consultant whose newest "big idea" the last few years is..... Facebook. Be that as it may, the first legacy media that can actually prove it is helped it on any level MORE than it cost to advertise FOR Facebook will be celebrated - even by me. The problem is that after 4 years and millions of TV and newspaper marketing dollars spent pitching
GoFacebookYourself e Nickname posted 3 months ago
Spent pitching Facebook through their "pages" has resulted only in very few referrals from Facebook to media web sites -- and absolutey NO PROOF of helping legacy media. Have fun spending another four years "playing" on Facebook and using your airtime and marketing money tto shill a giant IPO and stock price while getting a very small return on web and none on your dying legacy media. Any person who calls herself a journalist and can't see the pure folly here is a total idiot. Obviously the strategy of using Facebook instead of spending money on Facebook promotions is a difference people like Rocker can not comprehend.
GoFacebookYourself e Nickname posted 3 months ago
It might be a zero sum game if Facebook penetration was equal to Internet penetration, but it's not. So anything focused on Facebook already eliminates half your audience from participation because only half of those consuming legacy news (tv or newspaper) have Facebook accounts. In some markets that number is more lopsided. Any time/energy spent on Facebook is half as effective to start with and then you have to hope those Facebook users make it to a revenue property such as your own website or newspaper or TV shows. Most journalists can not grasp this as they are blinded by the hype.
GoFacebookYourself e Nickname posted 3 months ago
And Rocker needs to perform research to understand the performance of the TV stations web properties. WSOC and WCNC had functioning real websites 10 years before a certain competitor had news on theirs. You can blame one person but your stupidity is clearly showing. If unrestrained embracing of social media by TV stations is so successful then how did WCNC get beaten in December by the much more focused strategy? Rocker, you and some other sad distorters of the truth must be ready to buy Facebook stock so you can finally have a chance at making money off the company you champion -- over the company that writes your paycheck. Pathetic.
GoFacebookYourself e Nickname posted 3 months ago
By the way... as Hypebook notes... did Rocker or other brain-dead fat bearded lazy fools even bother to read that this Overton person is all about Facebook interaction for media and is simply focused when it comes to PROMOTING Facebook? Because if said fools can read that is what is said. Who here is getting a paycheck from Facebook to defend promoting that site better than your own newspaper or Tv website? Your hourly rate you charge Facebook should go up based on recent IPO info. Of course, what do you expect from legacy media managers who have been fooled by every Internet con game for years so they can "manage up" to even more disconnected fools higher in the food chain -- such as GMs, publishers and CEOs who dont even understand any web metrics.
Ben Dover posted 3 months ago
Overton had some points - but failed miserably in his comments. GoFacebook Yourself = Overton?

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2867.08 -6.96 (-0.24%)
NYSE 7565.79 -27.03 (-0.36%)
S&P 500 1323.15 -1.65 (-0.12%)
Updated 05/17 11:06a ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content
Opinions
Features
Ideas
  • Mobile And The Media's Imploding Biz Model

    Michael Wolff: "If the news business on the Web is depressing, contributing to the existential angst that has gripped every established news organization, mobile turns the story apocalyptic: there is no foreseeable basis on which the news establishment can support itself. There is no way even a stripped-down, aggregation-based, unpaid citizen-journalist staffed newsroom can support itself in a mobile world."

  • WashPo Ombud's Paywall Analysis Is Faulty

    Ryan Chittum: "You can't compare nine months of circulation-revenue changes to 12 months of ad-revenue changes and then say the former 'didn't even cover the decline in the latter.' That's like giving somebody a 100 meter headstart in the 400 meters and then talking about how the laggard couldn't even compete, even though they ran faster than the rest of the field."

  • The 'Sharing' Mirage

    Frédéric Filloux on the benefits and pitfalls of teaming up with content distributors: "Media should be very careful with their level of reliance on other content distributors such as Facebook, Google, Apple or Amazon. This can be summed up to a simple question: can we trust them?The short answer is no."

  • Paywalls Open Doors For Local News Sites

    Howard Owens: "As a matter of business reality, when an incumbent business moves deeper into sustaining innovation it opens up opportunities for disruptors. In every market where a newspaper puts up a paywall, an opportunity is created for an entrepreneur to start a local online news business."

  • For Future Of News, Killer App Is Credibility

    Robert Hernandez, an assistant professor of professional practice in journalism at USC Annenberg: "With technology empowering everyone with the ability to create and to distribute, I predict — and wish — that in 2012 the new dominating factor will be Credibility. Actually, earned Credibility."

  • Layoffs, Cutbacks Lead To News Deserts

    Tom Stites: "Desertification is on the march, claiming more and more communities as newspapers continue to wither and few Web efforts manage to replace more than a fraction of the original reporting that newspapers have abandoned."

  • Moneyball: Fixing Newspaper Web Sales

    Mel Taylor: "Today's Newspaper industry is like that once great, but now struggling baseball team playing on a new, hyper-competitive field called the Internet. The veteran print team is stuck in a rut using the same, tired strategy that did serve them well for years, but no longer. Today, they get trounced by those with more money and muscle."

  • The Metric For Missed Expectations

    Matthew Shanahan: "Here’s the problem: [Click-through rates don't] take into account audience engagement, not to mention the fact that other advertisers are competing for the click-through on the same page."

  • View More Opinion & Commentary

     

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad