Editors' Blog

One Simple Reason To Go Local On The iPad

It comes down to one simple thing, and while it's an opportunity for all media, it could make a bigger difference for local media.
By
NetNewsCheck,

I've been holding my tongue as I watch the predictions fly back and forth about Apple's iPad and a host of other Internet tablets and eReaders in the works. Lots of valid points, none that hit the nail on the head for me.

For me, it comes down to one simple opportunity. And while it's an opportunity for all media, it could make a bigger difference for local media.

Story continues after the ad

A lot of the debate is whether there's any consumer demand for a medium-sized connected screen, and I'll grant that's a leap of faith. I personally don't want to carry around anything larger than my phone, but there are lots of times when I want to surf the web on the couch while watching TV (laptop too bulk from frequent relaxed use), or read information I got online at the kitchen table without printing out a ream of pages. So put me in the optimistic camp whether there's a sizable niche or even eventual mass market for these things.

And Apple has a pretty good track record for getting the details right that make new devices easy and exciting. So again it's a leap of faith, but I'll bet the iPad jumpstarts a new category of behavior. Some of the other startup devices will fall by the wayside, but Apple with clear a path for ones we haven't seen yet.

What I like about the iPad for online media is simply this: the opportunity to create a new habit, particularly a more frequent habit, and maybe even a more engaging habit. That's it. Nothing too fancy.  That's would solve a pretty significant problem for most local media right now - less content is consumed online vs. offline. Even with today's broadband speeds, the web is a slower experience than TV, newspapers or magazines. If the device lives up to half of Apple's usual appeal, it'll be habit-forming.

  • The convenience of being in a more comfortable spot coupled with the right device might actually make a difference. I saw a Google exec recently quoted as saying that making reading a leisure-time activity again would make a difference for newspapers.
  • Having the "visual bookmark" of an icon on the touchscreen might help make a habit - I visit the apps on my smartphone a lot more than the bookmarks in my browser.
  • Design could make a difference, too. Sure, web use could soar on an iPad, but designing an experience specifically for the device will probably make a bigger difference. Developing in a way that loads content faster could make a huge difference.

All of these things apply to any website - and there will be online-only publishers (even iPad-only publishers) who stake out early ground to take advantage of this. The reason this is more important for local media is pure economics. Loosely speaking, a national site can grab a few minutes of time from 1% of the population in every city and pay for itself many times over, with nice returns, while a local site can capture 25% of its local population and still not cover cost for creating a fraction of its content. Creating a more frequent habit, or making it easier to breeze through more content quickly, could make a difference.

If your content isn't right for the audience, this isn't going to help. But if a speedier, more comfortable, more regular experience helps reconnect with your local community on a more regular basis, it can't hurt to try.

Edit Article

Related Links

Tags

Comments (0) -

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2905.66 +45.98 (+1.61%)
NYSE 8060.43 +115.00 (+1.45%)
S&P 500 1344.90 +19.36 (+1.46%)
Updated 02/04 9:56p ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content
Opinions
Features
Ideas
  • For Future Of News, Killer App Is Credibility

    Robert Hernandez, an assistant professor of professional practice in journalism at USC Annenberg: "With technology empowering everyone with the ability to create and to distribute, I predict — and wish — that in 2012 the new dominating factor will be Credibility. Actually, earned Credibility."

  • Layoffs, Cutbacks Lead To News Deserts

    Tom Stites: "Desertification is on the march, claiming more and more communities as newspapers continue to wither and few Web efforts manage to replace more than a fraction of the original reporting that newspapers have abandoned."

  • Moneyball: Fixing Newspaper Web Sales

    Mel Taylor: "Today's Newspaper industry is like that once great, but now struggling baseball team playing on a new, hyper-competitive field called the Internet. The veteran print team is stuck in a rut using the same, tired strategy that did serve them well for years, but no longer. Today, they get trounced by those with more money and muscle."

  • You Should Only Work This Hard If You Own The Business

    Howard Owens, digital media pioneer and author of HowardOwens.com, writes on Patch editors: "But here’s the thing about the work load for Patch editors: They’re not owners. They are expected to do all of the things they would have to do if they owned their own web sites, but merely in service of building wealth for AOL shareholders. Sure, work hard and keep your job is a nice benefit, and as a former corporate employee I think employees have an ethical obligation to help build shareholder value. That’s what they’re paid to do. ... However, if what we’re hearing is true about the Patch workload, I can only ask: Why are you doing it?"

  • The Metric For Missed Expectations

    Matthew Shanahan: "Here’s the problem: [Click-through rates don't] take into account audience engagement, not to mention the fact that other advertisers are competing for the click-through on the same page."

  • Debate Over Naming Commenters Rages On

    Eric Pfanner on real-name commenting policies: "The complications are enormous. Even self-contained Internet services like Facebook have had difficulty enforcing 'real name' systems. To achieve this on the borderless Internet would be impossible."

  • Communities Lose Out When Papers Close

    Author Ken Doctor on MediaNews Group's decision to consolidate its Bay Area newspapers: "It isn’t simply the sad loss of middle-class journalism jobs, as lamentable as that is, just as so many other good jobs that have disappeared in recent years. It’s a community loss, and points to the wider impact of news cuts on the society in which we live. That’s often forgotten as we focus too narrow on industry loss."

  • Why AOL Should Double Down On Patch

    Maxwell Wessel, member of Harvard Business School think tank Forum for Growth, on AOL's Patch: "Patch is AOL's last, best chance to build a growth engine. Investors shouldn't be calling for AOL to back off the business. They should be calling for AOL to double down ... by increasing commitment."

  • News Orgs Should Use Innovation As A Tool

    Frédéric Filloux: "News organizations ... should view innovation as their main weapon against direct competitors and emerging players such as tech startups."

  • View More Opinion & Commentary

     

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad