TV Stations Getting An Early Jump On Mobile

"TV stations have gotten a jump on other media in applying mobile to their online efforts," says Kip Cassino of Borrell Associates. He expects that by 2015 or 2016, mobile will comprise about 60% of all online advertising and TV will account for 20%-30% of it.
By
NetNewsCheck.com,

What a difference a few months make. Back in March, Marc Montoya of Nexstar Broadcasting Group, spoke enthusiastically about the mobile ventures that four Nexstar stations had launched.  But he was reluctant to make any projections on future mobile rollouts.

Now he confidently predicts that by the end of June, around 20 Nexstar stations will have some form of mobile service such as WAP-enabled mobile sites, SMS texting or apps for iPhone and Droid smart phones.

Story continues after the ad

"Mobile is going to be the next big thing," says Montoya, Nexstar's SVP of e-media sales and operations.

And Nexstar is not the only TV station group that thinks so. Raycom Media, for instance, is offering mobile services at all 32 of its news-gathering stations. And Cox Media Group has either WAP sites or iPhone apps running in all 11 markets in which it operates.

Despite the enthusiasm, Borrell Associates describes the broadcasters' mobile business today as "more of a staging ground for TV stations in the next two or three years than it is a source of significant revenues."

Borrell estimates that local TV mobile revenues amounted to $29 million last year, or 12% of all local mobile advertising. The majority of TV stations received less than $20,000 from mobile advertising last year, according to Borrell's Benchmarking TV Web Site Revenues report.

But local mobile "is growing like Topsy" says Kip Cassino, Borrell's VP of research. He expects that by 2015 or 2016, mobile will comprise about 60% of all online advertising and TV will account for 20%-30% of it.

"TV stations have gotten a jump on other media in applying mobile to their online efforts," he says, noting that when online advertising came to the fore, newspapers beat TV stations to the table.

TV stations' current mobile efforts are a prelude to mobile DTV, the full-motion video service developed by the Open Mobile Video Coalition. With the help of area stations, OMVC is now conducting consumer trials in Washington. Broadcasters are hopeful that it will eventually become a robust revenue producer, but right now it is unproven.

At Nexstar, the mobile offerings aren't just some kind of trendy gimmick. "The stations have to make money on these apps, or they don't run them," Montoya says. "We have them do business plans before they launch [mobile services]."

The expectation is that Nexstar stations will generate "four times on return for any product or program that we put out there," Montoya adds.

Raycom's Pat LaPlatney, VP of digital media, says that the company's mobile business is "modestly" profitable today. "But we expect it to be a significantly profitable business before long. I think it's going to be a great driver of growth over the next five to 10 years."

Some of the companies that provide stations with mobile products and services are also bullish. Lee Durham, president-CEO of LSN Mobile, says that the national and regional mobile advertising his company sells for almost 250 stations is doubling every month.

One of LSN's competitors, News Over Wireless, announced an 800% increase in ad revenue in the first quarter 2010 versus same time last year.

Jimmy Goodmon, VP-GM of NOW parent Capitol Broadcasting Co., says that the company's WRAL Raleigh, N.C., is reaping profits from its mobile business. And the campaigns NOW is booking on behalf of more than 155 station affiliates range from $1,500 to $10,000 per mobile site in a typical 30-day period.

DoApp Inc. creates applications for mobile devices and has an ad network geared to local advertisers. The majority of its 200 clients are TV stations with news operations.

"We deliver over 2 million advertising impressions a day, with a growth rate of roughly 11% per month," reports DoApps CEO Wade Beavers, whose ad network allows advertisers to lure consumers with promotions in very specific geographic zones.

Jeffrey Ulrich, Cox Media Group's senior director, digital sales strategy and training, says local rivals in other media sectors don't have the footprint or the cross promotional power of TV to effectively compete. "That's a great opportunity and advantage that we have over non-broadcast companies," he adds.

But Ulrich is among those who also see some challenges with mobile as well. "It is a media sale that's accompanied by a higher level of education and enlightenment than we're used to," he says. "Clients are looking to us to be their digital tour guide. The key is to have trained sellers and vendor partners that are eager to join you in that conversation."

Others note that gaining TV sales team support has been difficult at some companies, particularly in a year like 2010, with the Olympics and a strong political advertising climate.

Rick Ducey, chief strategy officer at the research firm BIA/Kelsey, notes a need for better accountability of mobile ad results  -- "a nice analytic dashboard, getting an exclusive and timely assessment of ROI."  

Edit Article

Comments (0) -

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2905.66 +45.98 (+1.61%)
NYSE 8060.43 +115.00 (+1.45%)
S&P 500 1344.90 +19.36 (+1.46%)
Updated 02/04 9:58p ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content
Opinions
Features
Ideas
  • For Future Of News, Killer App Is Credibility

    Robert Hernandez, an assistant professor of professional practice in journalism at USC Annenberg: "With technology empowering everyone with the ability to create and to distribute, I predict — and wish — that in 2012 the new dominating factor will be Credibility. Actually, earned Credibility."

  • Layoffs, Cutbacks Lead To News Deserts

    Tom Stites: "Desertification is on the march, claiming more and more communities as newspapers continue to wither and few Web efforts manage to replace more than a fraction of the original reporting that newspapers have abandoned."

  • Moneyball: Fixing Newspaper Web Sales

    Mel Taylor: "Today's Newspaper industry is like that once great, but now struggling baseball team playing on a new, hyper-competitive field called the Internet. The veteran print team is stuck in a rut using the same, tired strategy that did serve them well for years, but no longer. Today, they get trounced by those with more money and muscle."

  • You Should Only Work This Hard If You Own The Business

    Howard Owens, digital media pioneer and author of HowardOwens.com, writes on Patch editors: "But here’s the thing about the work load for Patch editors: They’re not owners. They are expected to do all of the things they would have to do if they owned their own web sites, but merely in service of building wealth for AOL shareholders. Sure, work hard and keep your job is a nice benefit, and as a former corporate employee I think employees have an ethical obligation to help build shareholder value. That’s what they’re paid to do. ... However, if what we’re hearing is true about the Patch workload, I can only ask: Why are you doing it?"

  • The Metric For Missed Expectations

    Matthew Shanahan: "Here’s the problem: [Click-through rates don't] take into account audience engagement, not to mention the fact that other advertisers are competing for the click-through on the same page."

  • Debate Over Naming Commenters Rages On

    Eric Pfanner on real-name commenting policies: "The complications are enormous. Even self-contained Internet services like Facebook have had difficulty enforcing 'real name' systems. To achieve this on the borderless Internet would be impossible."

  • Communities Lose Out When Papers Close

    Author Ken Doctor on MediaNews Group's decision to consolidate its Bay Area newspapers: "It isn’t simply the sad loss of middle-class journalism jobs, as lamentable as that is, just as so many other good jobs that have disappeared in recent years. It’s a community loss, and points to the wider impact of news cuts on the society in which we live. That’s often forgotten as we focus too narrow on industry loss."

  • Why AOL Should Double Down On Patch

    Maxwell Wessel, member of Harvard Business School think tank Forum for Growth, on AOL's Patch: "Patch is AOL's last, best chance to build a growth engine. Investors shouldn't be calling for AOL to back off the business. They should be calling for AOL to double down ... by increasing commitment."

  • News Orgs Should Use Innovation As A Tool

    Frédéric Filloux: "News organizations ... should view innovation as their main weapon against direct competitors and emerging players such as tech startups."

  • View More Opinion & Commentary

     

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad