'Portfolios of many smaller businesses'

Reinvent Your Business Now, Papers Told

Longtime industry consultant Barbara Cohen offers advice for managing a multi-platform news business: “The day of the big spaceship and little tiny things around it are over. We are going to be managing portfolios of many smaller businesses.”
By
NetNewsCheck.com,

The question for newspaper executives is not whether to erect an online paywall, says advertising industry veteran and media consultant Barbara Cohen. The question is how to restructure the way they think about their businesses, from top to bottom, and to find new ways to monetize their content.

Local advertising revenues “will not be enough” to support newspapers in the coming years, Cohen told the Media Financial Management Association’s annual conference in Nashville this week.  “Twenty-one percent of local advertisers plan to advertise less in newspapers,” she said, “and disproportionately, it is the bigger advertisers who are planning to spend less.”

Story continues after the ad

Not  only are legacy product revenues “not going to recover,” Cohen predicted, put publishers must understand that in the future, their big legacy products will no longer drive their businesses they way they once did.

“The day of the big spaceship and little tiny things around it are over,” she said. “We are going to be managing portfolios of many smaller businesses.”

Cohen offered advice on a wide range of business issues:

SMARTER SEGMENTATION. Before publishers can decide how to monetize these businesses, they must abandon their long-held practice of thinking of their users as readers, and begin to think of them as consumers.

“Consumers are no longer the stepchild of the newspaper business,” Cohen said. “They are now front and center.”

This means that publishers must understand how news consumers behave, to segment them into categories and to decide which categories they want to serve.

Consumers fall into three important demographics: How old are you? How much do you make? And do you have kids at home?

“Cut your data by these segments,” Cohen advised, “and build strategies on devices, monetization and products.”

Research by Cohen’s firm indicates that 25% of consumers “don’t care about local news and information,” she said, “and of those who do care about local, 25% have not read the paper or been to its website.”

**WHO WILL PAY? ** The best opportunities to monetize come with heavy users — those who subscribe to the paper and visit the website three or four times per week — and single copy purchasers, Cohen said.

Subscribers, for example, are open to paying more. “We have found we can charge a lot more for out subscription, and one way to do this is to bundle in full access to the archives, as a premium service.”

Subscribers are also open to receiving their news in different ways. “We can look at what is happening in Detroit. They have been adjusting home delivery so that subscribers get an e-edition on some days and a home-delivered paper on others,” she said. “You know your market. Are you making money on Monday and Tuesday? There is opportunity for blended subscriptions.”

THE TRUTH ABOUT ONLINE PAYWALLs: When it comes to paywalls, publishers must stop thinking about them as a way of limiting, Cohen said. “Think of them as: ‘What are we going to give?’ ”

Publishers are finding that paywalls can pay in non-competitive, isolated markets where a single paper dominates the news, Cohen said, and they work for papers, such as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times, that provide information readers can’t get elsewhere.

They have failed in large metros where two papers compete and content is not unique enough to command a fee.

“Freedom Interactive did some wonderful testing and shared the results at April’s Newspaper Association of America convention,” she said. “In competitive markets, their pageviews went to heck, money went out the door and they stopped the test,” Cohen said.

“The folks at Freedom will tell you it’s not about pay wall, it’s about penetrating your market.”

This means knowing your consumers and how they are using news, Cohen said.

ONLINE ADVERTISING remains an important revenue stream but here, publishers must invest in search engine optimization and search engine marketing, Cohen said.

“We are leaving behind the 27% of folks who come to the site only occasionally. The only way to monetize them is through advertising, but we need to get them to the site.”

Marketing is critical for reaching these occasional users, Cohen said. These are consumers who currently go to a local TV station’s site for their news.

Why? “It’s simple, easy to get in and get out,” she said. “Navigation is the biggest criticism we have. We need to redesign our sites, search engine optimize and get fantastic search engines on our sites.

DATA, MARKETING and HYPERLOCAL SEGMENTS: Analytics and marketing are critical, Cohen said, because publishers must think of themselves as running a retail business. “We need to know what our consumers are doing and how they are getting to the store,” she said.

Nowhere is this more critical than in top-50 markets where more than one publisher competes, Cohen said. In cities like these, publishers must move to a guerilla approach, battling it out zip code-by-zip code and deciding which types of consumers they want to cater to.

Edit Article

Comments (0) -

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2905.66 +45.98 (+1.61%)
NYSE 8060.43 +115.00 (+1.45%)
S&P 500 1344.90 +19.36 (+1.46%)
Updated 02/04 9:50 ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content
Opinions
Features
Ideas
  • For Future Of News, Killer App Is Credibility

    Robert Hernandez, an assistant professor of professional practice in journalism at USC Annenberg: "With technology empowering everyone with the ability to create and to distribute, I predict — and wish — that in 2012 the new dominating factor will be Credibility. Actually, earned Credibility."

  • Layoffs, Cutbacks Lead To News Deserts

    Tom Stites: "Desertification is on the march, claiming more and more communities as newspapers continue to wither and few Web efforts manage to replace more than a fraction of the original reporting that newspapers have abandoned."

  • Moneyball: Fixing Newspaper Web Sales

    Mel Taylor: "Today's Newspaper industry is like that once great, but now struggling baseball team playing on a new, hyper-competitive field called the Internet. The veteran print team is stuck in a rut using the same, tired strategy that did serve them well for years, but no longer. Today, they get trounced by those with more money and muscle."

  • You Should Only Work This Hard If You Own The Business

    Howard Owens, digital media pioneer and author of HowardOwens.com, writes on Patch editors: "But here’s the thing about the work load for Patch editors: They’re not owners. They are expected to do all of the things they would have to do if they owned their own web sites, but merely in service of building wealth for AOL shareholders. Sure, work hard and keep your job is a nice benefit, and as a former corporate employee I think employees have an ethical obligation to help build shareholder value. That’s what they’re paid to do. ... However, if what we’re hearing is true about the Patch workload, I can only ask: Why are you doing it?"

  • The Metric For Missed Expectations

    Matthew Shanahan: "Here’s the problem: [Click-through rates don't] take into account audience engagement, not to mention the fact that other advertisers are competing for the click-through on the same page."

  • Debate Over Naming Commenters Rages On

    Eric Pfanner on real-name commenting policies: "The complications are enormous. Even self-contained Internet services like Facebook have had difficulty enforcing 'real name' systems. To achieve this on the borderless Internet would be impossible."

  • Communities Lose Out When Papers Close

    Author Ken Doctor on MediaNews Group's decision to consolidate its Bay Area newspapers: "It isn’t simply the sad loss of middle-class journalism jobs, as lamentable as that is, just as so many other good jobs that have disappeared in recent years. It’s a community loss, and points to the wider impact of news cuts on the society in which we live. That’s often forgotten as we focus too narrow on industry loss."

  • Why AOL Should Double Down On Patch

    Maxwell Wessel, member of Harvard Business School think tank Forum for Growth, on AOL's Patch: "Patch is AOL's last, best chance to build a growth engine. Investors shouldn't be calling for AOL to back off the business. They should be calling for AOL to double down ... by increasing commitment."

  • News Orgs Should Use Innovation As A Tool

    Frédéric Filloux: "News organizations ... should view innovation as their main weapon against direct competitors and emerging players such as tech startups."

  • View More Opinion & Commentary

     

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad