Site Specific: Examiner

CBS Local Deal Opens Doors For Pureplay

Examiner.com, the Clarity Digital Group-owned local-content network, has opened up new audiences with a recent deal to provide its vetted user-created content on niche topics to CBS Local. The deal also creates new revenue streams for the network, adding to what is already drawn from display ands and sponsored content.
NetNewsCheck,

%22+width%3D

As editorial models shift and evolve in the digital age, one might say that Examiner.com has followed a variation on the big box approach: Outsource everything, but make sure it comes in bulk.

The three-year-old site, a division of the Clarity Digital Group LLC, which itself is owned by Denver-based Anschutz Co., is as much of a network as it is a destination for users. To date, over 85,000 “examiners” contribute content to the site on a wide array of topics according to its operators, who said that it has built up a content library of over 2.5 million articles and growing.

Story continues after the ad

Until recently, that content lived exclusively on Examiner’s own site, arranged by topic and cross-referenced with contributors’ locations, but a deal inked with CBS Local last December opened up a whole new audience — and revenue stream — for Examiner. Now a select group of contributors to the site have been tapped to produce exclusive lifestyle content including “Best of” guides and “Top Spots” lists of restaurants, shops and nightlife for all of CBS Local’s 25 websites across the first quarter of 2012.

For Leonard Brody, president of Clarity Digital, the CBS Local deal is the first of many projected partnerships that will leverage Examiner’s contributor network against sites that can no longer afford to internally produce the volume of local content that they would like.

Of Examiner’s impetus, he said, “The view was as the cost constraints went up and the coverage came down, you were going to see more and more of the things that people cared about squeezed out of those traditional venues,” Brody said. “The business was really created to build a large media network surrounded by self-motivated and independent examiners and let them write about the things that they’re passionate about in their communities.”

Examiner’s contributors are compensated based on the amount of audience engagement they generate following a pro-am model, Brody said. There are no editors at the site, he added, only a small editorial staff that curates content at national and topical levels for selection on the home page. Contributors use their own dashboards to self-publish their content.

Examiner+content+also+appears+on+CBS+Local+sites.
Examiner content also appears on CBS Local sites.

Unedited content might raise any number of red flags for Examiner visitors, not to mention potential media partners, but Brody said that contributor quality control happens at the front end of the relationship. “The real strength of the model is the vetting … at the front gate of the process,” he said, adding that writers who are selected based on their background experience and credibility on their chosen topic then go through “Examiner University” to learn the site’s protocols, expectations and publishing tools.

“They can write, they have some form of expertise and passion about the area they’re talking about and they also ideally have a local element to what they’re talking about,” Brody said.

They also tend to have some social media savvy and a strong motivation to promote their work and drive user engagement on that front, he noted. And for their part, those contributors leverage the platform on Examiner and their social following to gain credibility in their topic area.

“A pretty key component to this is a lot of our examiners are working their own social graphs and actually identifying and moving content and followers through those angles,” Brody said. “Examiner is a platform and a readership base, but they also cultivate their own.”

Paul Yanover, Examiner’s interim CEO, cited one contributor, who files exclusively on the Twilight books and films, as a particularly successful example of this dynamic. “She is well recognized by the studio that produces the movies,” Yanover said. “She has a huge following within Examiner and outside of Examiner through her own social reach.”

The contributor network’s growing bona fides resonated with CBS Local’s digital media president Ezra Kucharz, who enthused about the Examiner partnership in a written statement last month. “Taking our vision one step further by working with a stable of contributors with expertise in their field will greatly enhance the audience’s experience,” he said.

For Examiner, the CBS Local partnership validates its content streams. “It’s just a good stamp — they’re an amazing partner and it’s a great vote of confidence in the qualitative side of what we do,” Brody said.

Just as importantly, it opens up a viable new source of revenue to add to what’s being drawn from display ads and a sponsored content model. Of the latter, Brody explained, “It allows brands to work with the contributor base to actually produce content.” This doesn’t mean advertorial content, he noted, but rather an advertiser commissioning a bulk of content around a specific subject area, such as when pet food manufacturer Iams sponsored a quantity of stories around national pet adoption week last year.

Edit Article

Tags

Comments (0) -

Classifieds

The Market

Symbol Last Change (%)
Nasdaq 2938.25 -10.32 (-0.35%)
NYSE 8096.77 -18.66 (-0.23%)
S&P 500 1359.40 -2.81 (-0.21%)
Updated 02/22 3:36p ET Quotes delayed at least 20 mins.
Source: Financial Content
Opinions
Features
Ideas
  • For Future Of News, Killer App Is Credibility

    Robert Hernandez, an assistant professor of professional practice in journalism at USC Annenberg: "With technology empowering everyone with the ability to create and to distribute, I predict — and wish — that in 2012 the new dominating factor will be Credibility. Actually, earned Credibility."

  • Layoffs, Cutbacks Lead To News Deserts

    Tom Stites: "Desertification is on the march, claiming more and more communities as newspapers continue to wither and few Web efforts manage to replace more than a fraction of the original reporting that newspapers have abandoned."

  • Moneyball: Fixing Newspaper Web Sales

    Mel Taylor: "Today's Newspaper industry is like that once great, but now struggling baseball team playing on a new, hyper-competitive field called the Internet. The veteran print team is stuck in a rut using the same, tired strategy that did serve them well for years, but no longer. Today, they get trounced by those with more money and muscle."

  • You Should Only Work This Hard If You Own The Business

    Howard Owens, digital media pioneer and author of HowardOwens.com, writes on Patch editors: "But here’s the thing about the work load for Patch editors: They’re not owners. They are expected to do all of the things they would have to do if they owned their own web sites, but merely in service of building wealth for AOL shareholders. Sure, work hard and keep your job is a nice benefit, and as a former corporate employee I think employees have an ethical obligation to help build shareholder value. That’s what they’re paid to do. ... However, if what we’re hearing is true about the Patch workload, I can only ask: Why are you doing it?"

  • The Metric For Missed Expectations

    Matthew Shanahan: "Here’s the problem: [Click-through rates don't] take into account audience engagement, not to mention the fact that other advertisers are competing for the click-through on the same page."

  • Debate Over Naming Commenters Rages On

    Eric Pfanner on real-name commenting policies: "The complications are enormous. Even self-contained Internet services like Facebook have had difficulty enforcing 'real name' systems. To achieve this on the borderless Internet would be impossible."

  • Communities Lose Out When Papers Close

    Author Ken Doctor on MediaNews Group's decision to consolidate its Bay Area newspapers: "It isn’t simply the sad loss of middle-class journalism jobs, as lamentable as that is, just as so many other good jobs that have disappeared in recent years. It’s a community loss, and points to the wider impact of news cuts on the society in which we live. That’s often forgotten as we focus too narrow on industry loss."

  • Why AOL Should Double Down On Patch

    Maxwell Wessel, member of Harvard Business School think tank Forum for Growth, on AOL's Patch: "Patch is AOL's last, best chance to build a growth engine. Investors shouldn't be calling for AOL to back off the business. They should be calling for AOL to double down ... by increasing commitment."

  • News Orgs Should Use Innovation As A Tool

    Frédéric Filloux: "News organizations ... should view innovation as their main weapon against direct competitors and emerging players such as tech startups."

  • View More Opinion & Commentary

     

This advertisement will close automatically in  second(s). You will see this ad no more than once a day. Skip ad